Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Accountability Clause Introduction

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

But what does it mean?

As We the People of the United States of America enter 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) thus far continues to refuse to perform its Constitutional duty in declaring the meaning of the last 10 words of the First Amendment (aka: "Accountability Clause").

One might ask oneself, "While SCOTUS has ruled on every other provision of the First Amendment, why would it refuse to rule on the clause contained in the last ten words?"

Accountability Clause Origins

The unalienable right to petition for redress of grievances is found within England's 1215 AD Magna Carta:

The Magna Carta 1215 AD [section 61]:

“If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress.

If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.”

This is the first legal accountability clause whose principle served as a foundation upon which the Colonists' repeated petitions for redress were based. It was later omitted by the 1216 Magna Carta, when the King of England apparently realized that he had given his subjects too much liberty through the power to mandate a limited and accountable government.

This was also the legal precedent for the inclusion of an accountability clause within our founding documents. The American founding fathers apparently thought such a clause was important enough to include within the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

Limited & Accountable Government Rationale

The founders fully understood that the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government might someday fail in their duty to protect the people from tyranny.

Therefore, the founders specifically created two primary legal provisions through which We the People may peacefully mandate limited and accountable government: 1. the ballot box; 2. the First Amendment Accountability Clause.

Unfortunately, the latter is also known as the "forgotten clause", because barely any Americans are aware of its existence, let alone its meaning. Further and as previously mentioned, SCOTUS has thus far refused to perform its Constitutional duty in declaring the meaning of the First Amendment Accountability Clause.

The founding fathers also knew that unless the right to petition for redress (remedy) of grievances also included the right to withhold money from the government until the People's grievances were remedied, their grievances might fall on deaf ears and liberty would give way to tyranny and involuntary servitude.

Therefore, within an act of the 1774 Continental Congress regarding petitioning for redress of grievances (Accountability Clause), the founding fathers said:

“If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, [the People] may retain [their money] until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility.”

Founders’ Advice: No Redress, NO TAXES!

American Liberty in Crisis

Regardless of the particular administration, the US Federal Government has continued to transgress its limitations of power and jurisdiction as granted to it by We the People through the US Constitution in various ways.

Over recent years, the We the People Foundation & Congress has initiated steps toward legally addressing the matter of these various Constitutional violations, mandating limited and accountable government through the rule of law. However, thus far all three branches of government have ignored and/or stonewalled the lawsuits.

Learn More & Help Educate Americans

In order for We the People to mandate limited and accountable government, it is paramount that millions of Americans be educated about the Accountability Clause and what the founders had to say about it. Only when there exists a critical mass of Americans understanding these facts, will we be able to pressure Congress to either mandate that SCOTUS rule on its meaning, or otherwise organize the largest legal tax strike in the history of America.

For a brief overview of and introduction to these efforts, visit this website to watch the 2-part 15 minute video on this page: Recorded in 2008, this gives a concise overview of the petitions for redress lawsuits presented to Congress and the Supreme Court, and the founders' intent behind the Accountability Clause.

For a more detailed audio presentation by Bob Schulz regarding various Constitutional violations by the US Federal Government and why the decision was made to hold a Continental Congress 2009, visit: and download the 80 minute audio file "CC2009_PromoTour-Asheville_01.29.09.mp3" which is the CC2009 Promotional Tour with Bob Schulz of We the People, recorded in Asheville, NC on Thursday, Jan 29.

This audio presentation covers in detail the history of our unalienable right to petition for redress of grievances as guaranteed by the "Accountability Clause" of the First Amendment, the recent lawsuits including the failure of Federal Government response in all three branches, and the Supreme Court of the United States' refusal to perform its Constitutional duty in declaring the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.

Continental Congress 2009 was held in order to determine a strategy and means for We the People of the United States to mandate Constitutionally limited and accountable government through the rule of law.

Visit the We the People Foundation and Congress website to discover the outcome of the CC2009 — The Articles of Freedom — and help spread this information to Americans everywhere.